# 02 — Classification

**Project:** Kingsford Hotel Bacolod — BMS
**Date:** 2026-04-28

## Discipline

- **Primary:** BMS (Building Management System — HVAC + plumbing + EE monitoring + integration)
- **Secondary:** none significant. Power-provision interface to electrical contractor only.

## Stage

- **Greenfield (new construction)** — classified per technical evidence, not cover-letter wording.
- **Cited evidence:**
  - EE Plan is **Construction Bulletin No.8 dated 2025-11-05** issued *"to provide information on the 'For Construction' documents reflecting the electrical revisions due to the adjusted mechanical layout and the added power provisions for the kitchen layouts from Basement to 3rd floor."* This is a new-construction document set with active design revisions.
  - BMS Points list sheets BMS-01/02/03 are **stamped "Construction Bulletin" dated October 2025**, reviewed by F. Villa-Real II 2025-12-05. Same new-construction mode.
  - **No existing-system inventory** in the input bundle (no controller make/model/age, no head-end as-built, no demolition scope, no phasing/cutover plan, no "as-is" notes).
  - The kitchen layout adjustments and "added power provisions" indicate continuing greenfield design work, not retrofit of an operating building.
- **Cover-letter wording mismatch (Q-001):** the requirement letter uses *"Rehabilitation of Building Management System"*. Per Phase 2 rule (technical evidence beats cover-letter wording when they conflict), classify as **Greenfield**. Raise `Q-001` asking the customer to confirm the wording — likely the term "rehabilitation" is being used loosely in a developer/PM context where the building is part of a larger property "rehabilitation" master programme but the BMS itself is a new design.
- **Worked-example reference:** this is the same triangulation pattern documented in `_playbook/phases/02-classify.md` (Worked example — Kingsford Hotel Bacolod, 2026-04). Classifying as rehab when the technical reality is greenfield would inflate the proposal by ~₱2–4M (demolition takeoff, after-hours work premiums, cable-reuse evaluation, existing-system inventory).
- Decision recorded as **D-001** in `99-decision-log.md`.

## Scope type

- [x] **Supply** — explicit ("Complete Supply")
- [x] **Installation** — explicit ("Delivery, Installation")
- [x] **Programming / Engineering** — implicit (a complete BMS without programming is non-functional; standard for S+I+T&C scope)
- [x] **Testing & Commissioning** — explicit ("Testing and Commissioning")
- [ ] **Training** — not stated. Assume *included as a standard line item* per industry norm; flag in Phase 8 (`Q-016`).
- [ ] **Maintenance / O&M after handover** — not stated. Offer as **priced option** (1-year preventive maintenance) per Phase 4 (WBS 7.1).

Standard "S+I+P+T&C" engagement. Training and post-handover M&O surfaced as priced options pending customer direction.

## Facility type

- **Hotel / Hospitality** — Kingsford Hotel Bacolod is a casino-hotel in Bacolod City. Building footprint Lower Ground / GF / 2F / 3F / Roof Deck per riser EE-24 + points-list zoning, with guest-room banks (Casino, Hotel & Boutique tabulations on BMS-02), a 3F amenity level, GF public areas/restaurants/casino lobby, basement plant rooms, and roof-deck mechanical (cooling towers, DOAS, calorifier secondary).

## Estimated tier

- **Medium** — basis: BMS scope spans approximately the systems listed below. Quantity of points will be confirmed in Phase 5a A1 I/O list, but a coarse pre-count from the project-specific BMS-01/02 sheets and the standards-aligned coverage gives ~**600–1,100 BMS points** (typical hotel of this size).
  - HVAC plant (chillers, primary/secondary CHW pumps, CW pumps, cooling towers, boilers, calorifiers, header instrumentation) — basement/roofdeck/2F plantroom
  - Air-side (DOAS, PAHU, AHU, EAS) — multiple zones GF/2F/3F/roof deck
  - Plumbing/sanitary (calorifiers, hot-water headers, heat pumps, circulating pumps, sump pits, basement pumproom I/O)
  - Power-monitoring HLI to selected switchboards (per EE load schedules, scope to confirm)
  - Casino BMS + Hotel & Boutique guestroom integrations (BMS-02)
- Estimated CAPEX bracket (working assumption): **₱25M–₱45M PHP** for BMS Contractor scope (S+I+P+T&C, exclusive of M&O option). To be refined post-BOQ.
- Estimated schedule: **6–10 months** including engineering, supply lead-time, installation, T&C — gated by main-contractor's milestone (TBD per Q-013).

## Implications for later phases

- **Required-doc checklist column:** `bms-greenfield-hotel` (see `_playbook/checklists/required-docs-by-project-type.md`).
- **Module catalog:** `_playbook/modules/bms/` — all 11 BMS modules apply (head-end, network-infrastructure, controller-panel, field-devices-hvac, field-devices-plumbing, field-devices-power, cabling-and-containment, programming-engineering, testing-commissioning, training-handover, project-management-engineering).
- **Stage-specific assumption set:** greenfield-assumptions.
  - No demolition takeoff.
  - No hot-cutover or after-hours premiums by default.
  - No reuse-vs-replace evaluation of existing controllers/cabling.
  - Cable run estimates based on the new layouts (EE-03/06/09/12 + riser EE-24); no existing-cable reuse.
- **Special considerations:**
  1. Cover-letter "rehabilitation" wording mismatch — confirm before proposal issue (Q-001).
  2. BMS-04 (or beyond) sheet potentially missing from inputs — the BMS-01/02/03 set may not cover hot-water service distribution and guest-floor zone-by-zone tabulation (Q-002).
  3. No architectural floor plans — guestroom-corridor cable estimates fall back to assumption per drawing-availability triage in Phase 3.
  4. No project schedule / budget / commercial terms — flag as a block of clarifications (Q-013 schedule, Q-014 budget, Q-015 commercial terms).
  5. The MC Standards is generic CONDOTELS; project-specific BMS Points list sheets govern where they conflict.