# 02 — Classification

**Project:** Kingsford Hotel Bacolod — BMS Rehabilitation
**Date:** 2026-04-28

## Discipline

- **Primary:** BMS (Building Management System)
- **Secondary:** none — peripheral coordination with Mechanical (HVAC) Contractor and Equipment Suppliers as scope-boundary partners only

## Stage

- **Rehabilitation** *with greenfield-like execution patterns* — see signals below
- Cited evidence:
  - Customer cover letter (`Requirement.rtf`) explicitly: *"Complete Supply, Delivery, Installation, Testing and Commissioning for the **Rehabilitation** of Building Management System"*
  - **Conflicting/weak signals from technical docs:** issued documents are "Construction Bulletin" (BMS sheets dated Oct 2025; EE-CB#8 dated 2025-11-05) which is more typical of *active construction* — and the EE revisions are driven by "adjusted mechanical layout and the added power provisions for the kitchen layouts from Basement to 3rd floor", which reads like new-build coordination, not retrofit-into-existing.
  - **No existing-system inventory** in the inputs: no existing BMS controller make/model, no as-built BMS architecture, no demolition scope, no phased cutover plan, no "existing equipment to remain" notes.

**Decision:** Classify as **Rehabilitation** per the customer's explicit wording (highest evidence weight on contractual scope), but flag the wording mismatch as a clarification question (Q-001) so the team confirms whether: (a) this is a true *replacement of an existing legacy BMS while the building stays in operation* (cutover, hot-work permits, after-hours), or (b) "rehabilitation" is being used loosely to describe a refurbishment of an *existing hotel* with mostly-new MEP — i.e., greenfield-like BMS install in a refurb shell.

This stage flag drives downstream assumptions about: demolition + strip-out, hot cutover, existing cable reuse, after-hours surcharges, and integration with any existing legacy controllers.

## Scope type

- [x] **S — Supply** ("Complete Supply")
- [x] **I — Installation** ("Delivery, Installation")
- [x] **P — Programming** (implicit in T&C of a BMS — programming is integral)
- [x] **T&C — Testing & Commissioning** ("Testing and Commissioning")
- [ ] **TR — Training** (not stated — assumed standard operator/technician training included; Q-002)
- [ ] **M — Maintenance** (not stated — DLP only assumed; AMC offered as option; Q-003)

## Facility type

- **Hotel / Hospitality (mixed-use Casino-Hotel)** — Kingsford Hotel Bacolod
  - Casino at 2nd Level (separate MVAC zone with air ionizers)
  - Guest rooms: 3rd Floor and Roofdeck Level (per TUEC sheets and Megaworld CONDOTEL standard)
  - Public/Amenity at GF and 2nd Floor; BOH at Basement / Lower Ground (boilers, calorifiers)
  - Standard applied: Megaworld DRC-004-2024 (CONDOTELS)

## Estimated tier

- **Medium** — basis: roughly 600–900 monitored points by build-up of TUEC zones:
  - Basement-Podium BOH zone: AHU ×10 (140 pts), PAHU ×6 (81 pts), HW system (48 pts), General Vent (~80 pts)
  - Casino MVAC zone: AHU ×2 (30 pts), DOAS-2M ×1 (25 pts), Ionizers ×2 (4 pts) ≈ 60 pts
  - Hotel & Roofdeck zone: DOAS-RD ×2, PAHU-RD ×2, Cooling Tower, Boilers, Calorifiers — adds another ~150–250 pts
  - Plus Chillers (×2–3 expected, ~30 pts each = 60–90), CHW/COW Pumps & Headers (~40 pts), Cooling Towers (~20 pts)
  - **Working estimate: ~600–800 monitored points, ~250–350 BMS-supplied field devices, ~25–35 DDC controllers, ~6–10 panels.**
- Single building, single site → Medium tier confirmed.

## Implications for later phases

- **Required-doc checklist column:** `bms-rehab-hotel` (Hotel + BMS + Rehab) — see `checklists/required-docs-by-project-type.md`. If unavailable, fall back to `bms-greenfield-hotel` and overlay rehab-specific items (existing-system inventory, demolition list, cutover sequence).
- **Module catalog:** `_playbook/modules/bms/` (controller-panel, field-devices, network, head-end, integrations, programming, T&C, training, M&S, plus the supplemental modules)
- **Stage-specific assumption set:** rehab assumptions to load — *cable reuse default = no (full new pull)*; *demolition = strip-out of existing field devices and panels in scope*; *hot cutover = phased, after-hours work allowance*. These are tentative pending Q-001 resolution.
- **Special considerations:**
  - **Casino zone** (2nd Level) carries air ionizer monitoring + VOC + CO sensors at return ducts — not in standard hotel template. Treat as a small special module.
  - **Coordination with EE-CB#8** — power provisions for BMS panels need cross-checking against the Load Schedule (EE-21/22/23) and Power Riser (EE-24); a 240 V 1-Φ dedicated supply per BMS panel is the working assumption.
  - The Megaworld review process is active (sheets reviewed Dec 2025). Treat issued sheets as latest-governing per the EE cover letter's instruction.
  - **Equipment vendor C/O assignments are explicit** in the points list — DRC-004 already tags every device as `BMS Contractor / ME Contractor / Equipment Supplier`. This map drives Phase 5a's C/O matrix directly.